Welcome to Kovach Computing Services. This website uses 'cookies' to give you the best, most relevant experience. Using this website means you're Ok with this. You can find out more about them, and find out how to opt out of their use, by following this link (or by clicking the 'Privacy' link at the top of any page).

How do I run a Friedman's test with XLSTAT?

An Excel sheet with both the data and the results can be downloaded by clicking here. The data correspond to a sensory analysis where 10 experts have been asked to rate during two separate blind sessions the hardness of four different cheeses, on a [0->5] scale. Our goal is to determine if the difference in hardness between the cheeses is significant or not.

Once XLSTAT-Pro is activated, select the "XLSTAT/Nonparametric tests/Comparison of k samples" command, or click on the corresponding button of the "Nonparametric test" toolbar (see below).

Once you have clicked on the button, the dialog box appears. Activate the "Paired samples" option first, then click in the "Samples" field, and select the data on the Excel sheet: select with the mouse the 4 columns of data corresponding to the 4 cheeses (or samples, or treatments). As the cheeses names are included in the first row of the selection, leave the "Column labels" option checked. Then activate the "Multiple comparisons" option and the "Bonferroni" option so that if the hypothesis that the cheeses are the same is rejected, we may identify which cheeses are different.

After you have clicked on the OK button, the results are displayed on a new Excel sheet (because the Sheet option has been selected for outputs).

Interpreting the results of a Friedman's test

The first table displays the Friedman's Q statistic and the corresponding p-value. The p-value tells us that the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis although it is correct is lower than 0.0001. In that case we can conclude that we can securely reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the cheeses.

The next results allow to identify which cheeses are different from the others, as one would do with multiple comparisons tests in ANOVA. To take into account the fact that there are multiple comparisons on k groups, the Bonferroni correction is used. From the summary table below we see that the cheeses 2 and 3, and 1 and 3 are identified as different. Looking back at the data, the 3rd cheese is clearly the hardest cheese.

Click here for other tutorials. 

Copyright © 2014 Kovach Computing Services, Anglesey, Wales. All Rights Reserved. Portions copyright Addinsoft and Provalis Research.

Last modified 9 August, 2013